The Department of Justice is suing Texas over a new state abortion law

The Ministry of Justice claims that the law illegally violates women’s constitutional rights and violates the Rule of the Constitution, which says federal law replaces state law. Federal officials are also concerned that other states could pass laws that would “deprive their citizens of their constitutional rights,” he said.

“The law states that” a state cannot forbid a woman from making a final decision to terminate her pregnancy before recovery, “the lawsuit said,” but Texas has done just that. “

Texas law, known as SB8, prohibits abortions when medical professionals can detect heart activity – usually around six weeks, before some women know they are pregnant. Courts have banned other states from imposing such bans, but Texas law differs significantly because it allows private citizens to conduct civil trials instead of prosecutors.

Pressure increased not only from the White House on the Justice Department — President Joe Biden said the law is “almost non-American” —but also from Democrats in Congress, who wanted Garland to act. Earlier this week, Garland vowed that the Department of Justice would step in to enforce a federal law known as the Clinic Access Freedom Act.

That law, commonly known as the FACE Act, generally prohibits the physical obstruction of access to abortion clinics by closing doors or threatening to use force to intimidate or interfere with a person. It also bans property damage to abortion clinics and other obstetric centers.

The lawsuit, which opened Thursday, calls for an immediate ban on law enforcement in Texas. Under the law, a person can file a lawsuit – even if they have no relationship with the woman being aborted – and can receive at least $ 10,000 in damages if he or she succeeds in court.

“The law mandates all private citizens, regardless of personal contact or injury, to be allowed as reward hunters to receive at least $ 10,000 from anyone receiving assistance in exercising a woman’s constitutional rights,” Garland said. “The explicit and implicit endorsement of this legal plan is to prevent women from exercising their constitutional rights by violating judicial review.”

The attorney general also said Texas law could expel some federal employees from various government agencies from carrying out their civil liability.

Texas law since the Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that Roe v. Wade acknowledged that women do not have an abortion permit.

Abortion providers have said they will take action, but already some of the nearly two dozen Texas abortion clinics have temporarily stopped offering abortion services altogether. Meanwhile, clinics in neighboring states have seen a patient from Texas.

Texas Right to Life, the state’s largest anti-abortion group and the driver of the new law, said Thursday pending trial that it was already working with other states to pass similar measures.

“The Biden administration’s fraud represents a desperate attempt to stop the life-saving law in any way necessary,” the group said in a statement.

Renae Eze, a spokeswoman for Texas Attorney Greg Abbott, said his office is confident the court will uphold the law.

“The most precious freedom is life itself. Texas has passed a law that ensures that the life of every child with a heart attack is saved from abortion damage, ”Eze said.

The law does not provide for any exceptions in cases of rape or assault, which Abbott defended on Tuesday and falsely claimed that women have “at least six weeks” to commit rape. A woman who has regular periods and follows her cycle carefully may experience a positive result as early as four weeks of pregnancy.

Abbott also said Texas would try to “remove all rapists from the streets.” Recent investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice have found that most rapes go unreported to the police, including a 2019 survey that found that only 1 in 3 victims reported being raped or sexually assaulted. .